Tuesday, July 28, 2020

Tanzanite Gemstone: Changing the future of Tanzania’s small miners

This article is by

Share this article

Article Contributor(s)

Nikhita Gautam

Article Title

Tanzanite Gemstone: Changing the future of Tanzania’s small miners

Publisher

Global Views 360

Publication Date

July 28, 2020

URL

Miner Saniniu Laizer with the tanzanite gemstones

Miner Saniniu Laizer with the tanzanite gemstones | Source: Tanzanian government

A beautiful gemstone with a wide range of colours, from light to dark hues of blue and violet, found only in a patch 4 kilometres long and two kilometres wide at the foot of mount Kilimanjaro in Tanzania. Existing supply of these gems would run out in about 20 years and finding it in any other region has the probability of just one in a million. Tiffany & Co, the American jewelry manufacturer, described it as “the most important gemstone discovery in over 2000 years”. Yes, we are talking about Tanzanite, the pride of Tanzania.

This rare gemstone was in news recently when a small time miner, Saniniu Laizer found two large weighing 9.27 and 5.103 kgs which are the two largest tanzanite gemstones ever found. This discovery turned the miner millionaire overnight as those pieces were sold at about 3.35 USD. He was congratulated on live television by President John Magufuli, who himself was elected in 2015 with the promise of preservation of the nation’s interest in the mining industry. Mr Laizer’s mining operation includes more than 200 miners and he intends to use the money for the development of a school and a shopping mall near his home.

In order to promote the industry, many reforms were undertaken by the  government of Tanzania. It started taking a 50% equity in all mining projects after 2010 and banned the export of large sized raw gemstones. A fence was also built  in 2018 around the whole area where Tanzanite is mined but about 40% are siphoned without paying any royalty to the government.

However the discovery of such gemstones by a small miner was made possible due to the government policy of promoting local artisanal miners. In order to foster local ownership, the government gave the land and exclusive mining rights to the artisanal miners who mostly owned small and medium establishments. Many trading centres were established by the government in 2019  to facilitate these miners sell gems and gold directly to the government and earn better revenue.

Such discoveries sound promising for the industry in the light of how extensively they are promoted, and how many effective actions the government has taken to protect the industry. This also acts as a big morale booster for the small miners to redouble their efforts and search for the gemstones more vigorously.

Support us to bring the world closer

To keep our content accessible we don't charge anything from our readers and rely on donations to continue working. Your support is critical in keeping Global Views 360 independent and helps us to present a well-rounded world view on different international issues for you. Every contribution, however big or small, is valuable for us to keep on delivering in future as well.

Support Us

Share this article

Read More

February 4, 2021 4:55 PM

Suppressing the Minority Voting: An effective discrimination tactic of the US Conservatives

The recent protests over George Floyd’s death and reactions of the conservatives against the protest laid bare the systemic injustice and oppression faced by the people of color in the USA.

The other, albeit invisible form of discrimination perpetuated by the conservative political establishment in the USA is “Minority Voter Suppression”.

Though it may seem improbable that long after the Jim Crow laws are junked and Civil Right Laws are in place, the effort to disenfranchise the Black people is still going on.

The major piece of legislation which protected minorities from electoral exploitation was the Voter Registration Act which underpins the basic ideal of a universal adult franchise by specifically addressing and combating voting discrimination.

To ensure the representation to minority communities, this act mandated that “At-Large Elections”, where the whole of the jurisdiction elects all of the city council, were replaced by the single member districts in which each community selects a person to represent them in the city council.

It was also prohibited to draw the voting district in such a way that  minorities could be clubbed in only a few of the districts. It was also made mandatory for those states which have a history of discrimination to get pre-clearance from the justice department before changing their voting laws.

This law, however, lost its power in a process which began in 1980. In 1980 the Supreme Court ruled that at-large elections were not unconstitutional, on their own. In 1995, the Court began restricting the construction of majority minority districts on grounds that it segregates people on the basis of race.

In 2008, the court ruled that a photo voter ID law in Indiana was constitutional and was in state interest to protect against voter fraud (research shows that photo voter IDs provide disincentive to vote for people of color). The voter ID law requires the voters to have a government-issued photo ID to cast a ballot.

In 2013, the Supreme Court scrapped the part of the law which stated that some states (which had an alleged history of discrimination) needed federal preclearance in any changes of their voting laws, meaning that the state laws would need approval from the federal government before being put into practice. This was done so citing that the methods which determined discriminatory states were invalid.

All of these slowly chipped away at the laws, and especially the 2013 Shelby County vs Holder case which led to a host of issues whVoter Suppression is Still One of the Greatest Obstacles to a More Just Americaich directly/indirectly keep a significant proportion of minorities from voting. Few of such actions are closure or relocation of precincts in majority black areas, purge of minority voters from the voter lists, and elimination of Sunday early voting days which are preferred by black voters.

There have been attempts to restrict registration drives in Tennessee on the basis that many of the forms were incomplete.

There have also been laws enacted which needed people to participate regularly in elections to keep their voting rights and reply to a letter sent to their residence, which makes it difficult for Black and Hispanics due to obscure areas and the fact that they’re half as likely than other people to get a day off work to vote.

The governor of Georgia, Brian Kemp, has been accused of using intimidation tactics to scare minority communities.

In Texas, the acting secretary of state said that he had a list of 95,000 non-citizens who were registered for voting in the state, and 58,000 of them had already cast a vote. That claim was proven untrue when it was noted that there were tens of thousands of people who were naturalized citizens.

In many states, felons are not allowed to vote even after they have served their sentence, and in Florida felons are allowed to vote only if they have paid an array of fees after serving their sentence, which sets an economic bar on their ability to vote.

This is evident that forces working against the equal rights for the minority communities are still working at full force to reverse the gains of civil right movements. The fight for the unhindered voting rights for the minority communities in the USA at the social, political, and judicial front will continue in the foreseeable future.

Read More